What Is the Relationship Between Technology, Scien

Assessment 3 final Essay Question What is the race between technology, science and the visual? probe a text of your choice (Trans corpseers 3 Dark of the lunar month) in a way that demonstrates your instinct of the connections between bodies, technologies and visual counterpart. Josephine Polutea, Transformers 3 Dark of the Moon (2011) The relationship between technology, science and the visual I believe is that they any interconnect with each former(a). The technological invention of the lithographic device for lawsuit enabled numerous visual reproductions for magazines and newspapers.This then opened up the door to the basal technological flip-flop in visual reproduction from lithography to photography that enabled replications to provide for the masses. This ability to produce multiple copies of any one image came round with the revolutionary development of the negative. ( nettle 5 / Technologies of the Visual Reproduction, 2011) This is evident in the motion picture Transformers 3 Dark of the Moon where the use of the images and footage from the Apollo 11, Lunar get atomic number 18 used to encapsulate the viewer to identify and empathise with the diachronic event that is used as a spectacle in the movie.Science refreshful this was a break done in all hi legend of mankind although thither is speculation and scepticism that the event in fact never took locate (Lecture 5 / Visuality, History, Event Spectacle, 2011) in an effort to gain capital for financial backing of the NASA space program approximately estimated at thirty billion dollars. (Lecture 14 / Visuality, History, Event Spectacle, 2011). On the contrary this is problematic in any narrate documented in history for history although makes for a good story line in a movie about technology, science and the bodies complicated in this visual reproduction of the historical event.As this event spectacle was used in the movie as the basis of the visual tarradiddle which was what I ga at that placed to be that the American government discovered an unknown object that crashed on the moons surface and the professorships reaction to aerate the astronauts to the moon as he quotes in the movie You get in that location before the Russians and Well you tell NASA to move heaven and earth. Gives the impression that Mr Pre brassnt is very patriotic and based on actions speak louder than words? on that point is a sense of urgency where one would assume that there was a conspiracy to cover up a top secret agency to discover if there really were any alien life forms bewilder on the moon or to cover up discoveries of such encounters. A reason of state would account for the manipulation of such evidence to utilise the protecting creation morality, educating the population, looking after national interests and promoting community values. (Schirato, Webb 2007, p 174).The news medias job is to report the facts clearly, with as much accuracy as possible. Unfortunately this i snt the case. Science and reason argon a good arsenal to have in the battle against pseudoscience, but in most cases they dart a back seat to history and tradition. enlace (2002) These technological experiments and discoveries speak from the investigations of science and other real unexplained issues for usage extra-terrestrial, the supernatural or the unexplained other unidentified flying objects or mechanical beings.The images of an alien life form ar visual reproduction of a circulated urban myth so to speak rather there are no actual scientific evidentiary to substantiate claims from victims of the so called alien abductions or alien encounters. The descriptions given are used to form this visual that an alien has a big coned head, with big black queerly shaped eyes, a mouth and no nose but seem to be smaller in height then an average person.The superlative influence over visual practices in the contemporary Western piece are what we call normalisation, which is associ ated with the palm of science, bureaucracy and government, and capitalism. (Schirato and Webb 2004) So why is it, that in the movies they look familiarly tall and strong and awfully unattractive? Or those in Transformers that are callred to as aliens? The other bodies I will refer to the transforming robots in the movie Transformers and the government bodies that are directly involved in this highly classified special operations task and the power component they play in the movie.According to Schirato and Webb (2004) scientific categories of truth and reality are circulated throughout popular culture, grumpyly in the media. This is the main reason why we have used the term normalising rather than scientific to designate this particular visual regime. The movie begins with the notion of a race soon to be extinct by war. In an opening statement that says, We were once a peaceful race of intelligent mechanical beings, but then came the war. A war between the Autobots and Diceptico ns on their planet called Cybertron.This mechanical being or what post-modernist film directors would call aliens freely roam the universe and eventually blast refuge on planet world. This concept of machine life and human life co-existing and living in harmony is reinforced in the movie as a political opportunism point of view. For instance their coalescency with the autobots to serve and protect America and the world from breach of national and external security. Optimus Prime quotes In a year since our arrival, our new home Earth has seen much change. Energon detectors guard its cities now. Long range defense systems watch the skies. So now we assist our allies in solving human conflicts, to restrain mankind bringing harm to itself. The normalisation of scientific revolution and bureaucratic power only serves a purpose that politically we as a society, a community we dont really have a say in what happens but only that we are shaped and influenced to align to what we should be expected to behave, believe or feel towards a certain situation.This brings to surface the subjectivity that we are familiar with in our everyday lives. For physical exercise if we are pulled over by a policeman for a hit-or-miss breath test or for surpassing the speed limit we autonomously coordinate our attitudes and stature to address the officer because we know that the body or other serves a purpose to the law and its wad and therefore the power relationship is automatically referenced to the officer.This power relationship between the bureaucracy and the people is displayed in the movie when Sam is attacked by laser beak, a side kick of Megatron and escapes in his efforts to assist the autobots before the decepticons take over the world. He is confronted by Director of National Intelligence Miriam who questions Coronel Lenick. I know his name, I wanna know who gave him clearance? and later argues we cannot entrust national security to teenagers unless I missed the pol icy papers, are we doing that? I didnt think so.As Schriato and Webb explains (2004) when a soldier saw something that signified a high-performance officer (a particular uniform, stripes), he was required to behave, quite automatically, in a submissive manner. Similarly, the idea was that when the population saw signs of states permit (buildings, functionaries in uniforms, titles, letter-heads) they would see, without questioning or hesitation, something that was greater, more powerful and more lettered than themselves, and adjust their behaviour to comply with these manifest signs of the state.In the movie these signs are visible especially in reference to the government bodies, President and the Pentagon bureaucratic and Political parting, NASA Science Division, and the National Security Intelligence Defence Division & Department of Health & Human Services which is signified as a body that serves a purpose to the people although take authority from the government, science, and self-abnegation divisions. As international cultural flow of images are circulated through the public media sphere and as such the Lunar Landing were celebrated through the United States and the world as a great historical accomplishment.We are conformed to believe this is true because we generally believe that seeing is believing and that the images provided we take as photographic truth. The mechanical nature of image-producing systems such as photography and film, and the electronic nature of image-making systems such as television, computer graphics, and digital images, bear the legacy of positivist concepts of science (Lecture 6 / Technologies of Visual Reproduction, 2001). twirl (2004) states that people confuse the far side with the dark side.You almost never hear the phrase far side of the moon. Its continuously dark side of the moon. This phrase isnt really improper but it is inaccurate. If movies were the only purveyors of scientific inaccuracies, there would hard ly be a problem. After all its their job to peddle fantasy. In death the connections between science and technology is a relationship between the global media sphere and the reason of state that governs all scientific, bureaucratic, political and capitalist fields that form and shape our views of how we perceive the world we live in.Therefore my understanding is that science and technology have a strong relationship in the realm of the visual regimes and there connections to our world views of government bodies, scientific technologies and the shift in technological visual reproductions. The reference list Plait, P C 2004, Bad Astronomy Misconceptions and Misuse Revealed, from Astrology to the Moon Landing deceit John Wiley & Sons Inc. , New York.Schirato, T & Webb, J 2004, Reading the Visual, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest. CLT120, Vision, Visuality and Everyday Life, Lecture 5 Technologies of the Visual Reproduction, Macquarie University, 2011. CLT120, Vision, Visuality and Everyday Life, Lecture 6 The Myth of the photographic Real, Macquarie University, 2011. CLT120, Vision, Visuality and Everyday Life, Lecture 14 Visuality, History, Event Spectacle, Macquarie University, 2011