Intellectual Property and Copyright Laws in Australia Essay

Intellectual Property and procure Laws in Australia - study ExampleThrough the use of the copyright laws, the artists, songwriters, and medication recording companies will be challenged to produce and defecate their own unique and artistic musical piece (Golvan 7). The copyright laws quite a little be used to nourish not only the creators of artistic designs but also those individuals who create their own music, sound recordings, dramatic films, and pass around signals. Under the Australian copyright law, the copyright term in Australia has been increased from 50 to 70 years from the life of the author (Golvan 7 Remixd). It means that the writer of songs who was granted a copyright for their masterpiece is protect by the copyright laws for up to 70 years after his or her death. With regards to the essence of intellectual and copyright laws in Australia, this study will focus on discussing why the remix culture can be interpret as a sustained critique of the intellectual p roperty and copyright laws. To prove that the reproduction of remix songs can indirectly violate the intellectual and copyright laws in Australia, several real-life examples will be provided in this paper. lit Review Song remix is all about changing the form of an existing song by any enhancing the tone or the beat as a way of coming up with a more(prenominal) interesting sound and musical structure (James 24). By using the DJs special skills on basic scratches in order to match the beat, James explained that the DJs can easily alter the come up with an simply newfound sound creation establish on the original songs (25). Even though song remixed could offer an entirely new sound and beat, people who listen to remixed songs will always be able to determine and secernate the origin of remixed songs. According to Martin, the copyright laws in Australia and overseas are not keeping up with the digital era and are stifling creativity (Martin para 5). The problem with the remix cult ure is that DJs are using few form of digital gadgets (i.e. CD players, pitch control keys, etc.) in order to create an alternative music using songs that are already been protected by the copyright laws (James 24 25). For example, Martin mentioned that a couple of DJs based in San Francisco and Perth gathered in one occasion wherein these two DJs performed a remix using famous songs from Eminem and Aerosmith (Martin). Since the open viewers are patronizing remix songs, Martin pointed out that a lawyer in the Queensland University of Technology mentioned that a plentitude of amateur DJs are now demanding to have the right to produce remix songs whereby they should be given the title and vindication for their role as a remix producer. Because of the absence of a more precise and clear legislation with regards to the dedicate of modifying existing songs through remixes, a lot of amateur DJs are technically guilty of copyright encroachment yet these people are insisting that the remix culture is part of innovating new songs Derived from the copyright laws in UK, the Copyright Act 1968 in Australia clearly explained in section 31 that it is illegal to reproduce or dust all literary, artistic, dramatic, musical work, sound recordings, cinematograph films, television, and sound broadcast materials that are protected by the copyright laws and that the copyright owners of songs demand acknowledgement of their authorship from their musical masterpiece.