Interpreting Research Findings Essay

What follows are my responses to the hypothetical students who responded to the topic The human mind is a precise powerful tool of look. How does the mind subprogram statistics, deductive logic, and inductive think to interpret research findings? Student 1. Since you nominated the reference for your response, you may non realise the meaning of plagiarism. For example, the statement from Pinkers article (p. 2) In this conception, a computational system into existence appears in your response, without quotation marks or a page reference. The addition of the call forthhesized word mind does not make the repeat yours.There are similar examples throughout your response. You might affirm had barrier in empathiseing a highly theoretical article superstar that actually is from a scholarly journal (Pinker, 2005) and does not address the interrogative mood of development statistics, deductive logic, and inductive reasoning to interpret research findings. condescension adding these phrases to statements from Pinker (paragraphs 2 and 3), you did not answer the question. Student 2. Your first three sentences, though interesting, arent related to the question. look too that shuttings based on using the scientific method are not right answers/outcomes. The closest genius privy come to a right answer requires doing an experiment and then using inferential statistics to conclude that the probability of finding a get out such as yours by chance is so low (e. g. , . 05 or . 01) that its reasonable to conclude your experimental manipulation caused your results (Levin, 1999). Almost your integral response is related to descriptive statistics, wholly one part of the question. Your refer round deductive logic (the only route to certainty) does not relieve how it is used, and your quote about inductive reasoning is not, in itself, a have a go at it explanation of how such reasoning is used.Student 3. Your response was very good. Note that it isnt possib le to free ones mind of bias, which is wherefore methods are used to prevent human biases from influencing the results, as in the untainted double-blind experiment, where neither participants nor researchers know who is receiving the placebo and who is receiving the medication (Levin, 1999). Also, your sons conclusion was logical a conclusion is valid if it must be true if the assumption is true. He was in even off because his premise was incorrect (typical of a bright three-year-old).Also, your password of inductive reasoning was weak try thinking in monetary value of inferential statistics. As an aside, there were virtually violations of APA rules regarding citations and references. Student 4. Unfortunately, your response does not begin to address the question. Also, in answering a question you werent asked, you reached conclusions that have been disconfirmed in previous research. For example, theres a unattackable relationship between the behavior of peers and a teenag ers use of nicotine, alcohol, marijuana, etc. , but not a relationship between parent and child use of these substances (reviewed in Harris, 1995).Its true that educational and taproom programs have not been cost effective, but theres no evidence that such programs are effective at all, i. e. , that they influence teenage-smoking. forward you reach a conclusion on the something you will study, you need to read the relevant literature on previous research. Student 5. In a response as brief as yours, the first two sentences should have been related to answering the question. I also have no estimate of what your answer means to form somewhat of an argument that helps to interpret research findings. In discussing deductive reasoning, you needed to explain that incorrect premises can result in valid but incorrect conclusions and that factually correct premises can result in incorrect conclusions if the hypothesized conclusions are invalid (e. g. , in the classic example, knowing that all men are person and that Socrates was mortal does not imply that Socrates was a man). You also did not explain how statistics and inductive reasoning are used. Student 6. First, you did not provide any source(s). Had you used a book on statistics and design, e. g. , Levin, 1999, you would have avoided some errors, described below.Your examples of descriptive statistics are accurate, but your explanation of inferential statistics is not. A audition is used to generalize about a population, not about a larger sample. Also, if blue were the favorite color of 80 multitude in a sample of snow, you could not conclude (or speculate) that if you sample 1000 people, blue would be the favorite color of 800. You could conclude, for example, that if you repeatedly (infinitely) sampled 100 people from the same population, the probability of failing to find that a majority favor blue is known and small (e. g. , . 05 or . 01).It may be important to understand correlational research, but th e question was to explain how detail tools were used to interpret research findings. One tool, deductive logic, does not, as you stated, debate that a series of statements are facts. You also needed to use quotation marks in your statement from Kerlinger, 1986, Hypotheses are declarative more variables and the wide of the mark Kerlinger reference should have been provided (you should not have included references you had not cited).Finally, your conclusion regarding your dissertation suggests you do not understand how the three research tools historied in the question are used, e. g. , do you intend to use statistics only in your literature review?ReferencesHarris, J. R. (1995). Where is the childs environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458-490. Levin, I. P. (1999). Relating statistics and experimental design. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications. Pinker, S. (2005). So how does the mind work? Mind & Language, 20, 1-24.