“Of Mice and Men” A comparison between the book and film Essay

The similarity between the book and the delineation Of Mice and Men is close evident. Even so, there atomic number 18 a few differences, some insignificant and other crucial. However, in the majority of the scenes, the dialogs argon taken literally from the book.The out(a)set difference appears in the introduction of the motion-picture show. The book starts by describing the surrounding landscape painting of the Salinas Valley where Lennie and George spend the night by the river. We learn that Lennie is mentally challenged and how this change their stay at the farm where they previously worked. The film starts, however, by screening Lennie and George escaping from this farm and their journey to Salinas Valley.Another difference that I noticed is concerning Curleys wife. In the book there is a scene where Lennie, Candy and Crooks argon gathered in Crooks room. After a while, Curleys wife emerges and the automated teller machine becomes unpleasant. Crooks finds the courage to stand up against her, and when he does, she verbally breaks him down. In the delineation this scene never takes place, and by eliminating this incident Curleys wifes destructive nature stays unrevealed.The scene where George is about to shoot Lennie is in addition different in the film than in the book. In the book this sequence is long and George has a hard time shooting Lennie. I excite the impression that George is hesitating and unsure if this is the right thing to do. In the film the scene is much shorter and George appears considerably more secure . The movie ends with a scene where George and Lennie work together on the little farm that they where training to buy. This is not in the book at all.Other scenes that were go away out in the movieThe scene where Lennie has hallucinations about a giant coney and his aunt Clara.The scene after George has killed Lennie. In the book Slim creature comforts George by taking him for a drink.And the scene where Candy comes into the r oom when Lennie and Crooks aretalking about the little farm they are buying. In the film Crooks never finds out about the little farm.In my opinion twain the film and the book has its flaws. In the film some crucial scenes are removed, but I thought that the characters in the movie were better than in the book. In the book, I like neither George nor Lennie. I got the impression that George was a sensitive and kind man. He always watched over Lennie and tried do the right thing. In the film George is everything he is in the book, but he is also a wise man who people can undertake advice from. He has an inquisitive and contemplating look about him. I also liked Lennie better in the movie. In the book he was just a mentally challenged character, but in the film he becomes a soulfulness with real feelings and I understand his actions on another level.I cogitate that this would be a better film if they had shortened it. It seems to me that the film is an unnecessarily prolonged vers ion of the book. On the other hand, taking to many liberties when adapting this current classic into a film would not be a vivid thing to do.. Even so, I still think that the filmmakers should have left out some insignificant scenes. The story however, is brilliant the irony in the end where George kills Lennie out of love, how the story is composed of four major issues,(the encourage of dreams and goals, moral responsibility, social injustice, and the bond of friendship and loyalty,) and how loneliness is one of the of import emotions. The story is brilliant and genius, and only an outstanding writer like bath Stenbeck can create a masterpiece like this.