Discussion Questions

Running head : NO ! NO ! NOIt s a No ! No ! NoName of the StudentUniversity /SchoolName of InstructorCourse /SubjectIt s a No ! No ! No fond Security re of imports has been long established by the governance to meet the postulate of the masses for an pick upd life . divagation from that the main economic consumption of the curriculum is mandated by the gentle Rights and Freedom to have to a greater extent or less a beneficial life by dint of nest egg and other related programs . This provides each individual a clayey auspices over unexpected and expected wad such(prenominal) as aging , invalidity joblessness and the like . a ensure from that , it is the duty of the state and the federal government to insure a good life to its populace (International complaisant Security railroad tie , 2008A new issue has just been arisen after the resolve of chairperson George W . Bush about the issue on the verification in the privatization of the hearty Security System . He says that it is unwrap therefore to invest the earnings of the mess to the crinkle of reasoning merchandise than being kept in the government treasury (Smith ,H , 2001 . The historical score is that privatization is one among the key methods of the federal take to amplification the stocks and the investments of the rural . It is evident that there is a fluctuate serial publication in the stock rates of the country and among the federal governments way of stabilizing the stock market is to make up the investment bowl a semi privatization of the social security department . A nonher line of work is the assurance on the advance and proceeds if one has invested in the semi-privatized social security . go out it yield a juicy lolly or a low profit ? It was not really answered clearly by the federal government .

In this view unless those who are well-to-do have the horse sense to have insurance to the social security which beats the main goal of the program- to insure a stable financial righteousness of the massesLooking at the impersonation of the privatization amendment gives a less opportunity for the people to have their savings . As I can secure more or less the semi-privatization proposed by the president entrust later motility to a full privatized social security system aiming as an income generator to the government and not as a program of financial assurance to the masses . In effect only those who are well-off have the capacitance to gain profit on the syste m . Hence , my allow to the issue is a No ! No ! No ! to semi-privatization of the mixer Security SystemReferencesInternational Social Security Association (2008 . About Social Security ISSA : Promoting andDeveloping Social Security Worldwide . Retrieved fromhypertext transfer protocol /www .issa .int /aiss /s /About-social-securitySmith , H (October 2001 . What Would Happen if We Privatized Social Security . Human QuestNET line of merchandise Network . Retrieved fromHYPERLINK http /findarticles .com /p /articles /mi_qa3861 /is_200109 /ai_n8960081 /pg_2 ?tag artBody c http /findarticles .com /p /articles /mi_qa3861 /is_200109 /ai_n8960081 /pg_2 tag artBody col1It s a No ! PAGE \ MERGEFORMAT 2...If you pauperization to drum a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper