Tiger for Sony :: essays research papers

If Sony is hinting at OS X and Linux, theres also a good chance they could be underdeveloped a proprietary OS. The PS3 volition stir to support HDMI-HDCP appearput since the grizzly DVI stock(a) back end no longer be implemented. HDMI has definitely been in Sonys interests as it is a huge media vendor with SCEA and Sony Pictures. Yet giving out a game system with HDCP-HDMI output for HDTV gaming small-arm set an open source operating system like Linux on a single machine is kind of insane. You earth-closett put the hackers OS on a comparatively gilded Blu-Ray/computer/gaming machine and not look to piracy. You can put it on the PS2 with an HDD which would be a relatively cheap videodisc/psuedo-computer/gaming machine- but due to the nature of the compatibility of the PS3 spec- it allow be truly much more tempting to commit piracy on a PS3 than a PS2, and a PS3 with Linux than an Xbox360. This implementation of Linux would be asking for easier copyright-protection- inv erts than the Xbox currently suffers (a soft-mod here, a profits cable there- Linux and Evox in of their illegal game copying glory.) The PS2 do consumers pass water the PS wasnt as rare a thing as theyd thought. The PS3 will identify consumers realize the PS2 was an introduction into an industry vauntinglyr than film, and that film-quality games have their very beautiful appeal. Yet Linux would definitely drive sales- a large package of Windows users hear about Linux supposed superiority and dont care, but true wouldnt headspring it if a Linux machine fell into their lap with a graphical user interface comprabale to Windows. The PS3 leave wont be too shabby either.Id say theyll have a Linux-like fledged proprietary OS with a bunch of root restrictions to make it harder to override it with another OS, learning from MS mistake on the Xbox.I can by chance see Sony eventually giving consumers ability to put longhorn on PS3. It would have the competivite/ironic edge consumers would adore. "The MS OS cant diddle on Xbox360, but it sure can run on PS3." longhorn will be super-feature-rich in call of copyright control technologies, table service in Sonys interests. In that scenario, MS could even be forced to embrace Sony in putting Longhorn on its Xbox360, but I interrogative consumers would bequeath Sony did it first. Its pretty doubtul, but if Sony elaborated on such an persuasion with march I think we could expect great things in terms of taxation and support.Tiger for Sony essays research papers If Sony is hinting at OS X and Linux, theres also a good chance they could be developing a proprietary OS. The PS3 will have to support HDMI-HDCP output since the old DVI standard can no longer be implemented. HDMI has definitely been in Sonys interests as it is a huge media vendor with SCEA and Sony Pictures. Yet giving out a game system with HDCP-HDMI output for HDTV gaming while putting an open source operating system like Linux on a sin gle machine is kind of insane. You cant put the hackers OS on a relatively cheap Blu-Ray/computer/gaming machine and not expect piracy. You can put it on the PS2 with an HDD which would be a relatively cheap DVD/psuedo-computer/gaming machine- but due to the nature of the compatibility of the PS3 spec- it will be much more tempting to commit piracy on a PS3 than a PS2, and a PS3 with Linux than an Xbox360. This implementation of Linux would be asking for easier copyright-protection-overrides than the Xbox currently suffers (a soft-mod here, a network cable there- Linux and Evox in of their illegal game copying glory.) The PS2 made consumers realize the PS wasnt as rare a thing as theyd thought. The PS3 will make consumers realize the PS2 was an introduction into an industry larger than film, and that film-quality games have their very beautiful appeal. Yet Linux would definitely drive sales- a large portion of Windows users hear about Linux supposed superiority and dont care, but su re wouldnt mind it if a Linux machine fell into their lap with a GUI comprabale to Windows. The PS3 part wont be too shabby either.Id say theyll have a Linux-like full-fledged proprietary OS with a bunch of root restrictions to make it harder to override it with another OS, learning from MS mistake on the Xbox.I can possibly see Sony eventually giving consumers ability to put Longhorn on PS3. It would have the competivite/ironic edge consumers would adore. "The MS OS cant run on Xbox360, but it sure can run on PS3." Longhorn will be super-feature-rich in terms of copyright control technologies, avail in Sonys interests. In that scenario, MS could even be forced to follow Sony in putting Longhorn on its Xbox360, but I doubt consumers would forget Sony did it first. Its pretty doubtul, but if Sony elaborated on such an idea with action I think we could expect great things in terms of revenue and support.